Why was Socrates executed? He was tried in front of 501 of his Athenian peers who, acting as judge and jury, declared him guilty and sentenced him to death.1
The material charges were impiety toward the gods and corrupting the youth of the city. In reality, these were vague, trumped-up charges and Socrates would find himself tried in a kangaroo court. And he wasn’t even Australian. The real immaterial reasons for this turned out to be much more complex.
Tyranny in Athens
After Sparta had defeated Athens in the Peloponnesian War in 404 B.C., they installed 30 oligarchs (known as the 30 Tyrants) that oppressed Athens and are said to have killed 1500 Athenians—5% of the population—during their short eight month reign.2 Many Athenians left during this time. Socrates stayed. Some historians feel that this implicated him by association in their tyranny, even though it is recorded that Socrates disobeyed the 30 Tyrants when they asked him to join with them in their wrongdoing on several occasions. Nevertheless, perception is often taken to be reality. It also didn’t help that one of Socrates’ students, called Critias, became a leader of the 30 Tyrants. Eventually, the Tyrants were overthrown by rebel Athenian forces. The trial of Socrates occurred in this uncertain time of rebuilding after the reign of terror.
Socrates Irritates Athens
That historical-political background helps to clear up some of the confusion surrounding Socrates’ trial, but it doesn’t explain everything. For example, many people, even prominent figures, stayed in Athens during the reign of the Tyrants, but they were not tried and executed as Socrates was. So there was something more going on here. And that something was the fact that Socrates was a real irritant for the new rulers of Athens, a real pain in the ass, to put it bluntly. It didn’t help that he was ugly as well—he had a pug nose, sunken cheeks, thick lips, and bulging eyes.3 So there was this ugly, irritating guy going around Athens constantly causing trouble. No matter how unpopular Socrates became, he did not relent, for he was on a divine mission from which he could not be dissuaded. What was his divine mission that so irritated Athens?
The Oracle at Delphi
It all started when one of his friends visited the Oracle at Delphi.4 This was a very important Greek sanctuary where people would go to get wisdom and advice for individuals and cities from a priestess. His friend asked the oracle if Socrates was the wisest of all men and the oracle said yes! Imagine this ugly, irritating fellow being the wisest of all men. Well, when Socrates found this out, he proceeded to try to verify if the priestess was right or wrong. After all, that is a pretty big claim to make. So Socrates went around to anyone that he might find—politicians, craftsmen, ordinary citizens, etc., and asked questions about justice, truth, and wisdom. And Socrates found out an amazing thing: no one that he talked to knew anything. They were all ignorant. And not only that, but nobody knew that they didn’t know anything. Everyone thought that they had knowledge, but they were in total ignorance!
Wisdom out of Ignorance
Now this is the paradox of the matter. On the surface, it sounded like the Oracle stated that Socrates had more wisdom and understanding on matters such as justice and truth than everyone else. But in reality, Socrates was just as ignorant as everyone else on such matters. His wisdom lay in the fact the he knew that he didn’t know anything, whereas no one else had the wisdom to know the depths of their own ignorance. You can imagine why this would make people feel uncomfortable, to say the least, and why Socrates was so irritating: he exposed people’s ignorance. He was the opposite of a flatterer. From a historical perspective, we can find Socrates amusing, but to know him personally, we would probably find him to be abrasive. Needless to say, he was not the type of person that you would want to go out and have a beer with. It would be quite humbling to have an encounter with him.
But how about those charges of corrupting the youth and impiety? And why would the city fathers become so incensed at Socrates simply asking questions? More on that later.
Socrates left a legacy that revolutionized Western Civilization. He laid the foundation, if you will, of Reason. He did this by not only emphasizing the importance of seeking the Truth, but by making it evident that the best place to start is by admitting one’s ignorance. This is an apropos message for today. We think that our unparalleled technological advancements are a substitute for the wisdom of life. We mistake science for prudence. We mistake knowledge for wisdom. We are so adept at using our technology, but woefully unable to answer basic questions, like “What is the nature and purpose of man? Do humans have a soul or are we just material beings? And what is the nature of being itself?” It seems that the more advanced we become with technology, the more ignorant we become in the transcendentals of truth, goodness, and beauty.
Maybe we have come full circle and it is time for a change. The modern age is characterized by hubris. We are puffed up by our scientific advancements. Despite our great achievements, we are unable to quell the discord and heal division in our nation. Scientism rather than science has come to rule the day and the humanities have turned into indoctrination rather than an endeavor to seek the truth. What Socrates teaches us is that a good first step is to admit our ignorance.
“Be sure that this is what God orders me to do, and I think there is no greater blessing for the city than my service to God.5
- “Socrates was Guilty as Charges,” University of Cambridge, https://www.cam.ac.uk/news/socrates-was-guilty-as-charged
- Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopedia. “Thirty Tyrants”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 9 Mar. 2018, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Thirty-Tyrants.
- Zanker, Paul, Author and Shapiro, Allen, Translator, The Mask of Socrates: The image of the Intellectual in Antiquity, pp. 173-174, University of California Press, Berkley, 1996
- Plato, The Apology, Five Dialogues, Translated by G.M.A. Grube, Revised by John M. Cooper, pp 25-27, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2002
- Plato, The Apology, Five Dialogues, 30a-b, p. 34
Sources and Bibliography:
Collins, Philip Darrell; Collins, Paul David. The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship, An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century, iUniverse, Inc., Lincoln, NE, 2004
Coppleston, S.J., Frederick, A History of Philosophy, Book One, An Image Book, Doubleday, New York, 1985
Grayling, A.C., The History of Philosophy, Penguin Press, New York 2019
Hughes, Bettany, The Hemlock Cup: Socrates, Athens and the Search for the Good Life Paperback – Illustrated, Vintage Publishers, 2012, New York City
Plato, The Apology, Five Dialogues, Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo, Second Edition, Translated by G.M.A. Grube, Revised by John M. Cooper, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2002
Plato, The Last Days of Socrates, Revised Ed., Harold Tarrant (Editor, Translator, Introduction) and Hugh Tredennick (Translator), Penguin Classics, New York, 2003
Voegelin, Eric, Order and History, Vol. 2: The World of the Polis, classic reprint hardcover, Forgotten Books Publishers, London, 2018
Wilson, Emily, The Death of Socrates, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007
Xenophon, Conversations of Socrates, Waterfield, Robin H, Editor and Translator; Tedennick, Hugh, Translator, Penguin Classics, Ney York, Revised ed., 1990
If you liked this article, please comment or share. Thank you!